Calcutta High Court was told by the centre that the student can't challenge a law passed by parliament.
The Calcutta High Court on Thursday stayed the centre's notice asking a Polish student to leave India for allegedly participating in a protest rally against the Citizenship Amendment Act in Kolkata.
Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya restrained the government from giving effect to the notice till March 18 when the court will pass an order on the student's petition.
Kamil Siedczynski, the student from Poland who is enrolled for a masters' degree in the Department of Comparative Literature at Jadavpur University, was served a ''Leave India Notice'' dated February 14 from the Foreigners' Regional Registration Office (FRRO), Kolkata.
Opposing the Poland citizen's plea, the centre told the court that being a student visa holder, a foreigner cannot challenge a law passed by the Indian parliament.
Central government lawyer Phiroze Edulji submitted that a foreigner cannot challenge Article 19 of the Constitution, as it was not applicable to him.
Edulji further submitted that the notice was served on him by the FRRO on the basis of a field report.
In his petition before the high court, KamilSiedczynski prayed for a restraining order on the authorities from giving effect to the notice, which asked him to leave India within 14 days of receiving it, and from deporting him.
Since he received the notice on February 24, he was required to leave the country by March 9.
In the notice, Kamil Siedczynski is alleged to have engaged in anti government activities and thus committed visa norms violation, which the student denied.
Kamil Siedczynski's lawyer Jayanta Mitra submitted before the court that on December 19, 2019, while on an outing, he, was persuaded to accompany other students of the Jadavpur University to an event in the New Market area of Kolkata.
Claiming that he did so unwittingly and out of curiosity, Mr Mitra submitted that it transpired that the event was a peaceful protest being held by different sections of people.
He claimed that the student soon got separated from the others and
stood on the sidelines as an onlooker.
The student claimed that he was asked a few questions by a person, who also clicked his photograph and it later transpired that he was a photojournalist of a Bengali daily, where his photo and some related news were published. Mr Mitra claimed that some statements had been wrongly attributed to him in the report.
He claimed before the court that the notice, which was communicated to the student on February 24 when he went to the FRRO on being asked to, was arbitrary and contrary to principles of natural justice and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to all persons under the Constitution.
He submitted that it is not in consonance with India's obligations and is in derogation from the principles enunciated under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (1966), which are applicable to all persons.
Kamil Siedczynski, who is from Szczecin in Poland, has been studying in India since 2016 and has already obtained Post Graduate Diploma in Sanskrit from the Visva-Bharati university on scholarship before enrolling for the course at the Jadavpur University, where he is in the final semester and his examinations are scheduled to be completed by August, Mr Mitra submitted.
According to the petition, Kamil Siedczynski also appealed to the FRRO for reconsideration since he had only four months left to complete his full-time Masters'' programme at the university and "expressed remorse stating he had learnt a lot from his mistake and he undertook not to repeat the mistake".